MOOCs and Digitalisation of education
This project analysed data from the “Monitoring of Education Markets and Organisations” 2020 and reported on three aspects of MOOCs and online course adoption by Russian academics: MOOC use in teaching, online course authorship, and the intent to design personal online courses. I also discuss the topic of the digitalisation of HE.
Research outcomes
- Rotar, O., & Sheiko, K. (2026). Technology security in Russian education: highlighting socio-economic, technological, and ethical concerns. SN Social Sciences, 6(5), 170.
- Rotar, O. (2024). Who benefits? Discourse analysis of the national policy documents on digitalisation. [preprint].
- Rotar, O. (2023). Online course use in academic practice: an examination of factors from technology acceptance research in the Russian context, TechTrends, 1-28.
- Rotar, O. (2022). An Exploratory Analysis of The Determinants of MOOC Authorship Among Russian Academics. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP, 65.
- Rotar, O. (2022). The adoption of MOOCs among academics in the Russian higher education context. Proc. of the Intern. Conf. “eLearning Stakeholders and Researchers Summit 2021”, Moscow, December 1-2, 2021.
Student Support
It is widely recognised that student support is critical for overcoming barriers to learning and ensuring learner engagement, motivation, and success in online higher education. Although many support strategies are available for review, there have been no attempts to systematically analyze them in relation to the different stages of student learning. As a result, there is a lack of understanding of where and when student support can be embedded into the online learning curriculum. This project aimed to address this issue and answered the following research question: What support strategies can be offered to online students at different phases of the learning cycle? In doing so, this project developed a framework for embedding support strategies into different stages of the online learning cycle that can be used by online learning designers and educators.
By bringing together research on reported support strategies and interventions, this project aimed to develop a framework for embedding support interventions into various stages of the online learning cycle that can be used by online learning designers and educators.
Research outcomes
- Rotar, O. (2022). Online student support: a framework for embedding support interventions into the online learning cycle. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 1-23.
- Rotar, O. (2022). A missing theoretical element of online higher education student attrition, retention, and progress: A systematic literature review. SN Social Sciences, 2(12), 278.
- Rotar, O. (2021) Designing and developing courses that prioritise online student support [Blog].
Phenomenography
- Rotar, O. (2024). The Reflective Practice Framework for Phenomenographic Data Analysis. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 1-22
- Rotar, O. (2024). What we have learned from adult students’ online learning experiences to enhance online learning of other students’ groups?. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 19, 6, 1-37
- Rotar, O. (2022) From passing the exam to self-actualisation: different ways of conceptualising success among adult students in online higher education, Educational Studies Moscow, 265- 288